How can Hillary Clinton, the antithesis to a strong woman, potentially be the first female president of the United States?
I could never vote for Hillary. She is not the type of woman to whom any young woman should ever look up. She allowed herself to be humiliated by a man who never found a pussy in which he didn’t want to park his peck.
It wasn’t simply his infidelity, as much as it was her standing by him, allowing herself to repeatedly be played a fool. She lied, continually, to cover his tracks. She didn’t have the strength to be on her own. She needed a man, because she wasn’t much of a woman.
However, standing by him wasn’t enough. When Bill was exposed for sucking on pre-moistened cigars and dropping some white on a blue dress; does she blame him? Of course not! Hilary Clinton doesn’t possess self-esteem or self-reliance. She requires the man who continually brings disgrace upon her, so she flippantly opts to victimize her husband’s victims.
The infidelity has no relevance, what is relevant is her response to the disgrace brought upon her. Instead of kicking his ass to Pennsylvania Avenue’s curb, she attacks her sisters. She placed a man’s subterfuge above the well being of women.
She, in my opinion, is not solely a bad example for female empowerment — she is the opposite. Hillary sought destruction of women, over the truth about a man.